STUDENT SCHOLAR’S AND PEER’S WOUNDING: CONCEPTS & CONTROLS

Abstract

The research dealt with an important issue, which is the statement of how modern students deal with "Peer's Wounding"; they are imams and scholars who are equal in science and time. I edited the concept of Harming by Peer linguistically and idiomatically, and then I mentioned the advantage of this wounding over others, with an indication of the most important controls that help contemporary students to get away from Peer's wounding and how to approach it. The study was based on the inductive, descriptive, and analytical approach in explaining the aforementioned. It also indicated that the Peer critique is not like any other wounding, it was distinguished by several characteristics that differ from other wounding, and this helps the students to abide by the methodology of the scholars and the guidelines that they established and promised, and to reject fanaticism towards one scholar over another. Moreover, it warns against going too deep into this kind of wounding, since being careless and negligent about it, and spreading it, has a great impact on depriving students of the blessing of acquiring knowledge and benefiting from its people. As it belittles them and their scientific status among individuals and society, so it does not benefit from them or their knowledge.