THE CONTEMPORARY METHODOLOGICAL ERRORS THAT RELATED TO "ILM AL-HADITH" OF DEALING WITH AL-SAHIHAIN

Abstract

What is well known by Muslims in general and students of legal sciences in particular is that "the authentic of al-Bukhali" [Sahih al-Bukhari] and "the authentic of Muslim" [Sahih Muslim] are the two most authentic books after the book of God Almighty. However, some contemporary researchers in Islamic sciences and religious intellectuals do not stop raising anxious questions and problems, questioning the validity of this, Therefore this research, with its analytical approach, within the limits of the Two authentic books [Sahihain]. It aims to study the methodological specific defects in "Ilm al-Hadith" of these skeptics: denied al-Hadith due to the inconsistency of the narrations with the explicit Qur’an, or their clash with reason, and the reality. Adopting a wrong metheds in the sciences of hadith terminology, such as their neglect of collecting the narrations and hadiths of the studied area, or neglecting the reason for the coming of the hadith. Its conclusion reached the validity and authenticity of the noble Hadith, and showed the weakness of the methodology and weakness of the skeptics' contemporary compared to the ancient prophetic legacy.