Peer Review Process Statement

The manuscript submission process for Arrasikhun International  Journal follows a structured and impartial peer-review process to ensure quality and fairness:

Manuscript Submission: Authors submit their research articles to the journal.

Manuscript Check and Selection: The Managing Editor and editorial team conduct an initial check. They may accept the manuscript outright, reject it, or decide to proceed with peer review. Additionally, a plagiarism check using Turnitin is conducted for each submitted manuscript.

Technical Evaluation: Assistant Editor-in-Chief (Secretary) checks manuscript for compliance with guidelines and technical standards.

Peer Review: Managing Editor selects two experts in the field for double-blind peer review. Reviewers use standardized forms provided by the journal.

Review Decision: Editor-in-Chief evaluates reviewer comments and decides:

Acceptance: Manuscript accepted for publication.

Revision: Authors revise manuscript according to reviewer comments.

Rejection: Manuscript rejected for publication.

Revised Manuscript: Authors submit revised manuscript, if applicable.

Final Decision: Editor-in-Chief makes final decision based on revisions:

Accepted Submission: Manuscript accepted for publication without further changes.

Revisions Required: Author to address minor or major revisions based on reviewer comments.

Resubmit for Review (Conditional Rejection): Significant revisions required; resubmission invited for reconsideration.

Resubmit Elsewhere (Outright Rejection): Manuscript not suitable for this journal; authors encouraged to submit elsewhere.

Decline Submission (Outright Rejection): Manuscript rejected without possibility of resubmission.

Galley Proof: Accepted manuscript undergoes formatting, copyediting, and proofreading.

Publication: Manuscript published online.

Peer Review Process Flow

Detailed information about the flow for the manuscript submission (author) to the acceptance by the editor is shown in the following figure