التقعيد الأصولي للتروك

Abstract

Abstract

The research is about the legally competent individuals’ abstentions in general, and the extent to which they are considered as actions because of their effects, and the Prophet’s abstentions, may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him, in particular, and the details of their rulings in terms of their authority and following the Prophet’s example. The research was divided into two chapters: The first chapter dealt with the relation of the legally competent individuals’ abstentions to the jurisprudential rules, and the second chapter dealt with the relation of the abstentions of the Prophet, may Allah’s blessings and peace be upon him’ to the jurisprudential rules. The research concluded that abstention is a legal ruling that falls under the five categories of legal rulings. This includes the Prophet Muhammad's (peace be upon him) abstention from certain actions, which is considered part of the practical Sunnah for general emulation, except where specific evidence indicates otherwise. The research reached several key conclusions. First, there is a correlation between action and abstention in terms of being a legal ruling. Therefore, abstention is divided into the five categories of legal rulings. This includes the Prophet's (peace be upon him) abstention from certain actions, which falls under the practical Sunnah for general emulation, except where specific evidence indicates otherwise. Second, There are many branches based on these two principles, making them practical rules that apply to many legal rulings, highlighting their importance. Third, the principle of the Prophet's (peace be upon him) abstention, with its detailed regulations as explained in the research, is fundamental in distinguishing between Sunnah and innovation (bid'ah). This precise criterion is essential for making this distinction, necessitating its repeated affirmation.

Keywords: Restriction - provisions - abstention - taxpayers