Prosecution in rituals and its impact on medical jurisprudence

Main Article Content

محمد عبد الرحمن عبد الله الشهري

Abstract

The problem of the research lies in the lack of a specific reference for patients and health practitioners that explains to them the rulings of representation in rituals, despite their many questions about them and their ignorance of them because it is dispersed in the books of jurists, and its meaning is hidden from them. The research aims to collect the most important issues of representation in rituals needed by the medical community, clarifying their forms and rulings, and linking them to what patients and health practitioners need in one book to be a reference for anyone who needs it, especially those working in the health sector. The methodologies used in this research are the inductive methodology in collecting issues, the comparative methodology in mentioning the sayings of scholars and comparing them, and the deductive methodology in explaining the evidence of rulings and their significance. The research included an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion. The introduction included the research plan, and the introduction included the meaning of representation in the original and the meaning of representation in rituals. The first section included the ruling on representation in rituals and the wisdom thereof, and the second and third sections covered the issues of representation in rituals and its impact on medical jurisprudence. Then the conclusion included the most important results and recommendations of the research. The researcher concluded by explaining the most important issues of medical jurisprudence related to representation in rituals that are needed by patients and health practitioners, with an explanation of their forms, terms and conditions, as appears in the conclusion of the research


Keywords: prosecution - rituals - jurisprudence - medical jurisprudence

Article Details

Section
Islamic Studies