التطبيقات الدعوية لمراعاة الخلاف Advocacy applications of the rule of consideration of disagreement (analytical study)

Abstract

This study emphasizes the innate individual differences that afflict people in the worldly life as it is evidenced by the book, the Sunnah, and the biographies and as Sharia came in compliance with. Scholars have made one of the rules of fundamentalism a rule of (considering the disagreement). The primary question of the study addresses the following query: What are the advocacy applications that are derived from the implementation of the rule of (considering the disagreement) in the fatwa through the sources of the four considered schools of jurisprudence? To address this question, a variety of supplementary questions branch out. Where does the rule of (considering the disagreement) stand in the map of Jurisprudence sciences?  What the notion of the rule of (considering the disagreement)? What’s the application volume within the enriched scientific material for the rule of (considering the disagreement)? This is accomplished through the study plan, which contains an introduction that discusses the intrinsic individual differences, and the objectives and the importance of the study. The study also dedicates a chapter to discuss the definition of the rule of (considering the disagreement), its status, its relevance to other rules, its pillars, and the applicable conditions, followed by the advocacy applications of this rule, as it is study's focal point. The study is concluded with the references and the most important findings and recommendations, which include the initiation of the project of advocacy studies for the considered books of jurisprudence. This study adopts the inductive approach for the most important sources of the approved schools of jurisprudence and the deductive approach to discuss a number of applied issues connecting them with advocacy purposes while taking into account their conditions and the conditions of the people engaged in advocacy.

Keywords: consideration, disagreement, jurisprudence, applications, advocacy.